Skip to content
Mit diesen Worten hat Gesundheitsminister Bahr (FDP) die Forderung, die Preise in der seit 1996 geltenden Gebührenordnung für Ärzte um 30% anzuheben, abgelehnt.
Im gleichen Zeitraum stiegen die Diäten der Bundestagsabgeordneten um 45%.
Muss ich nicht kommentieren. Muss ich nicht mal wählen 
Neulich, in einer Anfrage des Amtsgerichts:
Fountoulakis K: The media and intellectuals' response to medical publications: the antidepressants' case. Annals of General Psychiatry 2013, 12:11 doi:10.1186/1744-859X-12-11
Abstract During the last decade, there was a debate concerning the true efficacy of antidepressants. Several papers were published in scientific journals, but many articles were also published in the lay press and the internet both by medical scientists and academics from other disciplines or representatives of societies or initiatives. The current paper analyzes the articles authored by three representative opinion makers: one academic in medicine, one academic in philosophical studies, and a representative of an activists' group against the use of antidepressants. All three articles share similar gaps in knowledge and understanding of the scientific data and also are driven by an ‘existential-like’ ideology. In our opinion, these articles have misinterpreted the scientific data, and they as such may misinform or mislead the general public and policy makers, which could have a potential impact upon public health. It seems that this line of thought represents another aspect of the stigma attached to people suffering from mental illness.
Die Sendung hat in Deutschland ein großes Medienecho ausgelöst und viele Patientinnen und Patienten, die mit Antidepressiva behandelt werden, erheblich verunsichert. Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) nimmt dies zum Anlass, um über die Chancen und Risiken der Behandlung von Depressionen mit SSRI aufzuklären.